Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FutureFinance
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:29:58
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Amazon launched a driver tipping promotion on the same day it got sued over tip fraud
- Fortnite maker Epic Games agrees to settle privacy and deception cases
- The Real Story Behind Khloe Kardashian and Michele Morrone’s Fashion Show Date
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Tribes Sue to Halt Trump Plan for Channeling Emergency Funds to Alaska Native Corporations
- Deep Decarbonization Plans for Michigan’s Utilities, but Different Paths
- Jurassic Park Actress Ariana Richards Recreates Iconic Green Jello Scene 30 Years Later
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- A Federal Court Delivers a Victory for Sioux Tribe, Another Blow for the Dakota Access Pipeline
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Gunman on scooter charged with murder after series of NYC shootings that killed 86-year-old man and wounded 3 others
- Tamra Judge Wore This Viral Lululemon Belt Bag on Real Housewives of Orange County
- Iowa teen gets life in prison for killing Spanish teacher over bad grade
- 'Most Whopper
- The blizzard is just one reason behind the operational meltdown at Southwest Airlines
- Video: Regardless of Results, Kentucky’s Primary Shows Environmental Justice is an Issue for Voters
- Make Waves With These 17 The Little Mermaid Gifts
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Climate Change is Weakening the Ocean Currents That Shape Weather on Both Sides of the Atlantic
El Paso mass shooter gets 90 consecutive life sentences for killing 23 people in Walmart shooting
Deep Decarbonization Plans for Michigan’s Utilities, but Different Paths
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
How an 11-year-old Iowa superfan got to meet her pop idol, Michael McDonald
Alberta’s $5.3 Billion Backing of Keystone XL Signals Vulnerability of Canadian Oil
Southwest cancels 5,400 flights in less than 48 hours in a 'full-blown meltdown'